Quote:

---

oh no course it has not
im just as crazy myself LOL

---

Quote:

---

of course i could always unban the banned people

---

Quote:

---

Double Ban!!! BAN BAN BAN!!!

---

I've apparently been double banned can you help with that. Not sure when this ban starts from tho

Quote:

---

of course i could always unban the banned people

---

But then i'd have to come and steal you car

Quote:

---

:D yeah, love to see you try! Its not good to upset me! Remeber who i work for

---

ME

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

:D yeah, love to see you try! Its not good to upset me! Remeber who i work for

---

ME

---

hahahahahahahahahahahah, omg, nearly died of laughing there, sorry.

Anyway, seen as i work for you then you must be my technical manager, so, as usual i will ask for your advice, and of course you will know all about the project i'm working on already....

Now, as a simulated target is coming in, hits the waypoint, the circle trajectory it then sweeps into (as to avoid the infinite acceleration) is not sufficient to describe realistic motion. Everyone knows it should be a sphere as when the target banks into the turn its drag increases, and thus its velocity will slow, and so it will drop in height, so a flat plane cicle cannot describe this. So the motion of the target after the waypoint needs a spherical motion not circular, now this isn't such a problem when the sphere is centred on (0,0) as the spherical equations are bog standard, but the egde of the sphere needs to be the waypoint, not the centre, and the sphere needs to be skewed so that it sits smoothly from the travel bearing of the target. Any suggestions on the spherical rotations then scott, and what tests should i be running to check that the targets acceleration round the sphere does not go above 10g?

Quote:

---

PMSL - Will be interesting to see what Scotty can suggest.

---

Yeah, me too, sure glad i work for scott he's soo clever being my boss and all.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

:D yeah, love to see you try! Its not good to upset me! Remeber who i work for

---

ME

---

hahahahahahahahahahahah, omg, nearly died of laughing there, sorry.

Anyway, seen as i work for you then you must be my technical manager, so, as usual i will ask for your advice, and of course you will know all about the project i'm working on already....

Now, as a simulated target is coming in, hits the waypoint, the circle trajectory it then sweeps into (as to avoid the infinite acceleration) is not sufficient to describe realistic motion. Everyone knows it should be a sphere as when the target banks into the turn its drag increases, and thus its velocity will slow, and so it will drop in height, so a flat plane cicle cannot describe this. So the motion of the target after the waypoint needs a spherical motion not circular, now this isn't such a problem when the sphere is centred on (0,0) as the spherical equations are bog standard, but the egde of the sphere needs to be the waypoint, not the centre, and the sphere needs to be skewed so that it sits smoothly from the travel bearing of the target. Any suggestions on the spherical rotations then scott, and what tests should i be running to check that the targets acceleration round the sphere does not go above 10g?

---

That is all very interesting Chris but you failed to realise you send that to a Computing Student and not a Physics Student, plz re-send it to ImReallyInterestedInChris'sStories@TheUniversityOfBoringPeople.org

I think they will be interested

As for moderating the forum, I think your doing a grand job

Quote:

---

hmmm, well, the phsycis point, ok yeah, but i have to code it up you berk! And what does that use, oh yeah, computers, funny that

If people find me boring i could always leave

---

NOOOOOOOOOO i couldn't live without your stories... they are brilliant

Quote:

---

If people find me boring i could always leave

---

No don't leave Chris. We'd all miss you if you did!

Quote:

---

so, do we have any spherical rotation specialists on the forum then, seen as my 'boss' is actually rubbish!

---

Erm...

UKFN.co.uk might have