#372104 - 29/11/11 08:47 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: STASON]
|
MountooningTipster
Registered: 26/08/07
Posts: 11640
Loc: here
|
Quote:
best thing to do honestly is get bank/building society that pays a flat rate interest.
and put your own money into the account.
I started mine when i was 20 since i have been putting £50 a month into it, no idea how much is in there will never know until i decide to retire.
probably when im settled with a home i'll put a lot more in.
jobs done.
public sector has been scrutinised by governments for years their greedy eyes lurking over the wall they built eyeing other peoples money bloody cheeky.

_________________________
 MR200 Stage 3 200PS Evans Halshaw Mountune Pro
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372105 - 29/11/11 10:41 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: YellowBadge]
|
Site Supporter
Registered: 15/10/08
Posts: 15118
Loc: Harpenden, Hertfordshire
|
I haven't read alot into atm I am siding with the goverment (Stu please don't murder me in my sleep)
All I can see is it bringing it into line with the private sector, bringing the retirement age into line I invite you to tell me the facts, keep it civilised like our other debate though
_________________________
 407BHP and 340lbft TD GT28/32 hybrid turbo, 3inch decat, 2.75inch exhaust, air intake + large MAF, injectors, fuel pump, tubular manifold
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372109 - 29/11/11 11:57 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: STASON]
|
Registered: 23/11/09
Posts: 4599
Loc: sheffield
|
And I Blame all those who voted conservatives. I'm not saying labour wouldn't do exactly the same, but why woul they build up something good for years then retract it. When the s**t hits the fan, the rules of the game changes, but atleast labour fight for the working/lower class. The cons want to make the rich richer, and won't pay up, so it's all down to us. The worker ants that are running around to pay for their 2nd homes, flash expenses, long holidays and mega pensions. The lib dems might aswell not be in govnt, and after these strikes and maybe more, expect massive restrictions on the freedom of unions and no more free milk!!! It's so unfortunate for public sector works who are bearing a greater brunt of this, and now where going to be left with a whole generation of uneducated retards, because who in their right mind, would lump up massive fees to go to uni, to spend years training to go into teaching jobs etc, just to be ragged around when reforms come up.
_________________________
Chuck Norris is never late, the world is just early!!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372110 - 30/11/11 09:09 AM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: H47PER]
|
Site Supporter
Registered: 15/10/08
Posts: 15118
Loc: Harpenden, Hertfordshire
|
Please strike more often, much less traffic today
_________________________
 407BHP and 340lbft TD GT28/32 hybrid turbo, 3inch decat, 2.75inch exhaust, air intake + large MAF, injectors, fuel pump, tubular manifold
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372112 - 30/11/11 06:47 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: Stephlar]
|
MountooningTipster
Registered: 26/08/07
Posts: 11640
Loc: here
|
I will give some detail shortly, finishing my tea. Meanwhile shops looked busy today !
_________________________
 MR200 Stage 3 200PS Evans Halshaw Mountune Pro
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372113 - 30/11/11 07:33 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: YellowBadge]
|
The South East Massive
Registered: 21/05/06
Posts: 50824
Loc: Kent
|
Loving the quiet roads..............  In and out of London in no time today
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372114 - 30/11/11 08:26 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: ROB IS THE STIG]
|
MountooningTipster
Registered: 26/08/07
Posts: 11640
Loc: here
|
History: Civil Service formed not sure when 1890's time, became a good working class job in the early days, low wages but good benefits, leave/flexi/pension/safe job. Mistake here was the pension scheme was non contributory. Much later private sector pay surpassed public sector pay, such was the difference, I remember when my dad was in the civil service they got something like a 20% pay rise. Modern times you would need to be at least three grades up HEO to match the national average salary, majority are low grades earning as little as £14,000.
It was only in 2003 that the government realised that the pension scheme must be changed. Since then existing employees pay 1.5%, new employees were given a choice of two schemes something like 3.5% and 5.5% depending on the terms they required. Note even the new employees will have to pay more again.
Thus all civil servants do pay into a scheme albeit one in huge deficit, in reality we are paying for the pensions being collected by the now retired civil servants. (nb the public says if we don't like it, opt out - fine if many did the deficit would grow and the pensions of those retired would be in danger, careful what you wish for Public it might be your dad/grandad who will have his pension reduced/taxed/stolen in future)
Current:- our pension retirement age is 60, we can work longer but pension is paid at 60, you can retire before 60 but your pension would reduced for the longer collection period.
Proposed changes:- Current scheme ends but what pension you have earned upto now will still be paid at 60. New Scheme commences. change to RPI from CPI a lower measuring index so a lower calculated pension. pension age aligned with state pension age, thus for me the new pension will be paid at 66. contribution increases to 2.7% (for me) then a further increase few years later.
Calculations show some people losing £20,000
the changes are too much, too fast, too many, some people will have to find another £60 per month, no staggering from 60 to 66 !
The maths are so complicated to work out, my issue is the existing scheme, whether any of you PS workers can answer this I don't know, I have just Emailed my MP.
If the current Classic Scheme ends which it will, does our 1.5% keep going into this OR will it go into the new scheme. We need to know, this is crucial and quite possibly where the money is lost (being moved). If contributions to this cease then your Projected Pension will devalue dramatically, if not then won't be too bad otherwise opting out might have to be the only way.
Here are FACTS from my last Pension Provider Projection for the current Classic Scheme to be closed !
currently have 27 years done
Retiring now (if I was now 60, I have 16 more years to go) £7,903 per year £23,709 lump sum Projected Pension age 60 £12,686 per year £38,058 lump sum
So, if payments into the current scheme cease the above projections will fall badly, retiring at 60 will be a no go, I suspect pension money is illegally being moved into the new scheme so as to bluff the higher contributions are paying for a higher pension when in reality it has been taken out of the existing scheme and withheld for six years.
yes yes, I know private sector has been hit and other side of this is many people do not even pay into a pension.
If your a lady public sector worker, jeez what a mess.
_________________________
 MR200 Stage 3 200PS Evans Halshaw Mountune Pro
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372115 - 30/11/11 08:30 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: YellowBadge]
|
Registered: 23/11/09
Posts: 4599
Loc: sheffield
|
Traffic was chaos at work because all the parent were using the day for Xmas shopping.
_________________________
Chuck Norris is never late, the world is just early!!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#372116 - 30/11/11 08:53 PM
Re: so, any public sector workers about
[Re: YellowBadge]
|
Registered: 05/01/11
Posts: 5720
Loc: UK, Essex
|
Quote:
History: Civil Service formed not sure when 1890's time, became a good working class job in the early days, low wages but good benefits, leave/flexi/pension/safe job. Mistake here was the pension scheme was non contributory. Much later private sector pay surpassed public sector pay, such was the difference, I remember when my dad was in the civil service they got something like a 20% pay rise. Modern times you would need to be at least three grades up HEO to match the national average salary, majority are low grades earning as little as £14,000.
It was only in 2003 that the government realised that the pension scheme must be changed. Since then existing employees pay 1.5%, new employees were given a choice of two schemes something like 3.5% and 5.5% depending on the terms they required. Note even the new employees will have to pay more again.
Thus all civil servants do pay into a scheme albeit one in huge deficit, in reality we are paying for the pensions being collected by the now retired civil servants. (nb the public says if we don't like it, opt out - fine if many did the deficit would grow and the pensions of those retired would be in danger, careful what you wish for Public it might be your dad/grandad who will have his pension reduced/taxed/stolen in future)
Current:- our pension retirement age is 60, we can work longer but pension is paid at 60, you can retire before 60 but your pension would reduced for the longer collection period.
Proposed changes:- Current scheme ends but what pension you have earned upto now will still be paid at 60. New Scheme commences. change to RPI from CPI a lower measuring index so a lower calculated pension. pension age aligned with state pension age, thus for me the new pension will be paid at 66. contribution increases to 2.7% (for me) then a further increase few years later.
Calculations show some people losing £20,000
the changes are too much, too fast, too many, some people will have to find another £60 per month, no staggering from 60 to 66 !
The maths are so complicated to work out, my issue is the existing scheme, whether any of you PS workers can answer this I don't know, I have just Emailed my MP.
If the current Classic Scheme ends which it will, does our 1.5% keep going into this OR will it go into the new scheme. We need to know, this is crucial and quite possibly where the money is lost (being moved). If contributions to this cease then your Projected Pension will devalue dramatically, if not then won't be too bad otherwise opting out might have to be the only way.
Here are FACTS from my last Pension Provider Projection for the current Classic Scheme to be closed !
currently have 27 years done
Retiring now (if I was now 60, I have 16 more years to go) £7,903 per year £23,709 lump sum Projected Pension age 60 £12,686 per year £38,058 lump sum
So, if payments into the current scheme cease the above projections will fall badly, retiring at 60 will be a no go, I suspect pension money is illegally being moved into the new scheme so as to bluff the higher contributions are paying for a higher pension when in reality it has been taken out of the existing scheme and withheld for six years.
yes yes, I know private sector has been hit and other side of this is many people do not even pay into a pension.
If your a lady public sector worker, jeez what a mess.
Exactly it's a massive scandal.
it should be taken further than just negations, you can't cut peoples money they are entitled too it's day light robbery!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
2157
Guests and
0
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
Registered: 11/06/26
Posts: 4
|
8607 Members
50 Forums
32288 Topics
561545 Posts
Max Online: 14753 @ 28/02/26 08:23 AM
|
|